What is Nirvana? Why is there different kinds of Nirvana? What happens to the enlightened ones after they enter Nirvana & pass away? These are the questions that have puzzled many Buddhists & non-Buddhists alike regarding the highest goal of the Buddhist Path. Different traditions have different explanations of this concept, but it is the Mahayana scriptures that provide the closest answer.Nirvana is best defined as "the unbinding of the mind from the mental effluents (asava), defilements (kilesa), the cycle of rebirth (vatta), & from all that can be described or defined. This term also denotes the extinguishing of a fire, & so carries the connotations of stilling, cooling, and peace."
In the Maha Parinirvana Sutra, Nirvana is described as possessing the 4 qualities of Permanance, Bliss, Self & Purity. Most who learn from the Pali Canon can understand why Nirvana is permanant, blissful & pure, but being so used to the concepts of Anicca (Impermanance), Dukkha (Suffering) & especially Anatta (No-Self), they find it difficult to grasp what did the Buddha mean when he said Nirvana is Self.
The Pali Canon also mentioned that the nature of Nibbana as being Viññanam Anidassanam, or Consciousness without Feature. In the Suttas, the Buddha was famous in his refusal to answer the query of what happens to Him after his Parinibbana or Final Nibbana. All that is mentioned is this "Consciousness Without Feature", nothing more. This term is best explained as being a non-active state of being so vast & subtle that it is beyond description.
This was why Ajahn Mun (1870-1949 a contemporary Thai forest monk who has attained Arahantship in his lifetime) was very disturbed by the visits from the Buddha and Arahants after his enlightenment. His immediate puzzlement was how a Buddha who has crossed over to Anupadisesa Nibbana (Nibbana without remainder) could possibly interact with our Conditioned Reality (this story is related in his biography, "A Heart Released"). Ajahn Mun's description of the Unconditioned (Vimutti) state is very similar to the Buddha's description of "Consciousness Without Feature" in the Kevatta Sutta.
The Buddha did not say what happens to him after Parinirvana bcos at that time the Kevatta Sutta was expounded, the listeners were not ready to accept the Mahayana teachings. But in the Maha Parinirvana Sutra, all these loose ends are explained in detail. What is called the "consciousness without feature" in the Pali Canon is none other than the Dharmakaya in the Mahayana scriptures, except that consciouness is already transformed into the 4 Buddha Wisdoms (Complete reflectivity, Perfect equanimity, Wonderous observation & Infallible success) and thus cannot be called consciousness any more.
The fact that Ajahn Mun could not understand how the Buddha & the past Arahants could still visit him after his enlightenment shows that the fruit of Arahantship is still far from that of the omniscient Samma Sambuddhas. What we understand from the term "anupadisesa nibbana" or nibbana without remainder is also not the true picture. Ultimate reality encompasses both the conditioned & the unconditioned, and thus cannot be separated into "with remainder" or "without remainder". That nibbana that can be separated is not the true Nibbana, but what the Mahayana Sutras described as an "illusionary city" for the Savakas (disciples) & Paccekas (solitary buddhas) to rest temporarily in because they do not have the aptitude to aim directly for the highest goal - Buddhahood.
When the Buddha talked about a Self, he was refering to the Dharmakaya, this ultimate reality, which is never apart from our own minds throughout all time & all space. This is the true Nirvana, beyond birth & death, coming & going, remainder & no-remainder, conditioned & unconditioned. It cannot be entered or exited because all the Buddhas never moved from it in the first place. So where are all those Buddhas now?
Right here in my closed mouth.





By now, all of us have seen the Israel-Lebanon conflict in the news. War is cruel & innocent people are dying. Scenes of the dead resemble that of the torments suffered in Hell. Where does all this suffering come from? 
To answer this question I believe it is best to go back to the 6th Patriach, who had this to say:




Wat
Over the doorway at the entrance of Wat
The police general came a third time, and the second medium claimed to be yet another spirit - 

If you contemplate on these changes, you will gain the insight that good & bad, happiness & suffering is all in the mind. It has nothing to do with birth, aging, sickness & death - these are only natural processes for the physical body, which is by nature illusionary. To give an example, for those old folks whose minds are happy & contented, old age is a time of relaxing & enjoying life. But for those who are bitter & dissatisfied, it becomes a time of anxiety & regret.
After reading what the Renpoche has to say about the Dhamma as well as his inner struggles when faced with different choices in life (especially in the dept of love), I came to the conclusion that he is merely an ordinary man. He may be very well-versed with the Vajrayana teachings, & might have been reborn many times practicing the Dhamma; he may even possess a mystic aura & be respected like a living Buddha, yet he still has not seen the true nature of his mind. He is much like the U2 song: "But I still haven't found what I'm looking for.." Which is sad, actually. Sangha Renpoche says he is "a salesman of the Dhamma", & Buddhism is his "product"; so he has a duty to present it in its most upbeat & attractive image to his "customers". And what better way to advertise his product than to advertise through his own self? But such thinking is inherently problematic, because of the profound & inconceivable nature of the Dhamma.
It is of course not a problem to walk freely between the sensual & spiritual world if you are enlightened, where duality is no more; but what happens when you are not? How can you confidently say sensual pleasures are empty & cannot taint your mind when you have not realized the supreme Dhamma? Remember the story of Kumarajiva giving a warning to his disciples? It is indeed a dangerous path to tread if you have not reached that kind of level. Judging from his writings, there is no doubt that Sangha Renpoche is still in the realm of duality. Even he himself admits that he is but a man, & enlightenment has not been reached.
The Renpoche explains that "all things arise due to dependent origination" & he cannot avoid those worldly trials due to past karma. If such is the case, why choose the path that is full of traps? Why not avoid this path altogether and stick to the safe shelter of the Vinaya? Only when you have broken Avijja can you throw away the guidance of the Vinaya, the Dhamma & all the scriptures, for by that time you will realize all the teachings are already present in your own Buddha-nature. Then you can choose to roam the world and live either the religious or the material life without any obstacles. To Sangha Renpoche, I only have this to say: stop creating the karma of birth & death; seek that which is beyond birth & death within your own mind. May he quickly reach the doors of the deathless, sadhu.

Although astrologers predict bloodshed and bad times ahead from the destruction of the revered Brahma statue in central Bangkok, what I'm more concerned is the possible backlash against the Muslim population in Thailand, even though the culprit is insane and could not be held totally responsible for such an act of terror. He might be dead, but the result of his actions will have far reaching effect on religious sensitivities in the kingdom. Given the political turmoil that is already shaking up the country currently, the situation could very well turn worse if further religious conflict enter the picture at this time.


